Our
Intelligence

Sharp analysis designed to move your business forward in a complex world.

We leverage our deep sector knowledge to keep you ahead of the curve.

Supreme Court of Canada rules inoperability of arbitration agreement in insolvency proceedings (Peace River v Petrowest)

Written by

Mahmoud Abuwasel

Partner - Disputes
mabuwasel@waselandwasel.com
Designated Zones and the Burden of Proof: An Analysis of Federal Supreme Court Case 1570/2024 on Excise Tax

This analysis was first published on Lexis®PSL on 07 December 2022 and can be
found here.

On 10 November 2022, in a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court of Canada rendered its ruling in the matter of Peace River Hydro Partners v Petrowest Corp. The decision provides clarification on when insolvency proceedings will render an arbitration agreement inoperative in the context of a court-ordered receivership. The Supreme Court of Canada refused to stay the civil lawsuit of a receiver despite the existence of numerous arbitration agreements. This is significant as (in the current economic climate) a commercial party may find itself subject to a dispute vis-à-vis an insolvent or bankrupt counterparty with an arbitration agreement governing the debt claim.

Peace River Hydro Partners v Petrowest Corp, 2022 SCC 41

Author: Mahmoud Abuwasel

Require assistance?

Contact us

inquiry@waselandwasel.com

Abu Dhabi:            +971 600 521 607
Dubai (DIFC):        +971 600 521 607
Melbourne:            +61 3 8691 3150
Toronto:                  +1 416 645 6426

See locations.

pexels eunice lui 931887 1

Share Content

Subscription Form

Joing Our
Intelligence Wire

Subscribed! Thank you for joining our Intelligence Wire.

more insights